WhatsApp and Telegram +44 7563 115980
[email protected]

A ledger joined to US payment rails, stablecoins and partner-bank accounts, with KYC and monitoring included.
Modern Treasury scores 2.5 out of 5 (50 out of 100) in the Buckingham Intelligence Core Banking and Ledgers Index 2026 and ranks 6 of 12. It is strongest for US fintechs wanting a ledger joined to payment rails, and its best criterion is product coverage at 3 out of 5. Not published or not stated on the pages read: pricing, deployment, product coverage, integration and security and regulated clients.
Scores from the Core Banking and Ledgers Index 2026.
No award in the Core Banking and Ledgers Index 2026.
| Segment | Score out of 100 | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| For banks and building societies | 54 | 8 of 12 |
| For E-money and payment firms | 50 | 6 of 12 |
| For fintechs building their own products | 47 | 4 of 12 |
The score out of 5 is the overall score out of 100 divided by 20. Leader goes to the top three overall, Best for to the first in each segment, and Top rated for to a score of 5 out of 5 on a criterion. Awards cannot be bought.
Where it scores best, and where to check closely, as shown in each ranking.
US fintechs wanting a ledger joined to payment rails.
What Modern Treasury publishes on its own pages, read on 26 October 2026.
A ledger joined to US payment rails, stablecoins and partner-bank accounts, with KYC and monitoring included. It publishes SOC 1 and SOC 2 Type II and PCI DSS 4.0, and states no minimum spend, but does not publish prices.
| Fact | What the provider publishes |
|---|---|
| Product coverage | Ledgers as "a single, immutable system of record"; payments across ACH, wires, RTP/FedNow, push-to-card, checks and stablecoins; "Payment accounts backed by regulated partners"; lending listed as a solution. |
| Pricing | "Usage-based pricing"; "No. All pricing is usage-based" in answer to minimum spend; Ledgers priced on "flexible usage tiers". No figures published. |
| Deployment | Run by Modern Treasury in the cloud; no cloud provider named on the pages read. |
| Integration | "One API for payments, accounts, and ledgering"; API reference and docs published; "Start building" sign-up. |
| Security and clients | "SOC 2 Type II and SOC 1 Type II Compliant"; "certified PCI DSS 4.0 compliant". |
| Scale | "Built on the infrastructure and proprietary ledger that has powered $600 billion in payments". |
| Date read | 26 October 2026 |
A fact that is not published is scored as not offered or, for a fee, as if it were high. It is never estimated.
Facts read on 26 October 2026 from: moderntreasury.com/products/ledgers, moderntreasury.com/pricing, moderntreasury.com/security.
Each score with the evidence behind it.
Each criterion is scored 0 to 5 against the best published offer in the Core Banking and Ledgers Index. 0 means not offered or not published. How it is scored
The other providers in the same ranking, ordered by score.
| Provider | Score out of 5 | Rank | Strongest for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thought Machine | 3.5 | 1 of 12 | Large banks replacing a legacy core on the cloud of their choice |
| SDK.finance | 3.0 | 2 of 12 | E-money firms and fintechs wanting a published price |
| Formance | 3.0 | 3 of 12 | Fintech and crypto firms wanting a ledger they can host themselves |
| 10x Banking | 2.6 | 4 of 12 | Banks that need published throughput and uptime figures |
| Pismo | 2.5 | 5 of 12 | Banks and large firms combining cards, lending and accounts |
| Mambu | 2.5 | 7 of 12 | Lenders and deposit-takers wanting audited SaaS |
| Temenos | 2.5 | 8 of 12 | Banks in many countries wanting packaged software or SaaS |
| Tuum | 2.3 | 9 of 12 | Banks wanting cloud or on-premise deployment with a stated launch time |
| Zeta | 2.0 | 10 of 12 | Banks launching card programmes |
| Finxact | 2.0 | 11 of 12 | US banks wanting an API-first core with a sandbox |
| Episode Six | 1.3 | 12 of 12 | Issuers wanting one ledger for cards, credit and deposits |
Side by side on every criterion, fact and award.
Head-to-head comparisons cover pairs within the top five of each ranking. Modern Treasury is compared with its alternatives in the table above.
Tell us what you need and where you operate.