Comparison · 2026 edition
Fingerprint vs SEON: fraud prevention compared 2026.
Fingerprint and SEON side by side in the Fraud Prevention Index 2026: scores, evidence, published facts and awards.
WhatsApp and Telegram +44 7563 115980
[email protected]
Fingerprint and SEON side by side in the Fraud Prevention Index 2026: scores, evidence, published facts and awards.
In the Fraud Prevention Index, SEON scores higher overall: 3.9 out of 5 (77 out of 100) against 2.8 (56), ranking 1 and 4 of 13. SEON also scores higher in every segment.
Overall and segment scores out of 100, and the score out of 5.
| Score | Fingerprint | SEON |
|---|---|---|
| Score out of 5 | 2.8 | 3.9 |
| Score out of 100 | 56 | 77 |
| Overall rank | 4 of 13 | 1 of 13 |
| For banks and lenders (out of 100) | 46, rank 10 | 76, rank 1 |
| For payment and e-money firms (out of 100) | 56, rank 3 | 77, rank 1 |
| For fintechs and marketplaces (out of 100) | 65, rank 2 | 78, rank 1 |
| Type | Device intelligence for fraud prevention | Fraud prevention and AML platform |
Each score with the evidence behind it.
| Criterion | Fingerprint | SEON |
|---|---|---|
| Fraud coverage | 3/5 New account fraud, account takeover and payment fraud published; scams and chargebacks not published. | 4/5 Payment fraud, account takeover, new account fraud and chargebacks published; scams not published as a product. |
| Published pricing | 5/5 Monthly prices with included calls and overage price published. | 4/5 Monthly price with included checks published for the starter plan; premium not priced. |
| Detection signals | 2/5 Device intelligence published; behavioural biometrics, shared data and explanations not published. | 4/5 Device, behaviour and network signals with explained scores; data shared across clients not stated. |
| Rules and case management | 0/5 Not published. | 3/5 Client rules, thresholds and case management published; backtesting and regulatory reporting not stated. |
| Integration | 4/5 API, SDKs, free sign-up and trial published; no go-live time. | 4/5 API, free trial, platform integrations and a stated go-live time; SDKs not confirmed on the pages read. |
| Security and clients | 3/5 ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II; no named regulated clients. | 4/5 ISO 27001, SOC 2 without type and PCI DSS, with a named regulated bank. |
Each criterion is scored 0 to 5 against the best published offer in the Fraud Prevention Index. 0 means not offered or not published. How it is scored
What each provider publishes on its own pages, read on 26 October 2026.
| Fact | Fingerprint | SEON |
|---|---|---|
| Coverage | Use cases: "New Account Fraud", "Account Takeover", "Payment Fraud", "SMS Fraud" and bot detection. | Use cases include Account Takeover, Transaction Monitoring, Chargeback Management, Mule Account Detection and New Account Fraud; "Stop bonus abuse, synthetic identity fraud, account takeovers and chargebacks". |
| Pricing | Free: "$0 /month", "up to 1,000 API calls per month". Pro Plus: "$99 per month which includes 20,000 API requests for web and iOS, as well as 500,000 API requests for Android"; "$4 per 1,000 additional API calls". | Starter: "$699 per month" with "2,500 fraud checks / month", 10 users and 50 custom rules. Premium: "Custom pricing". Free trial on request. |
| Signals | Device identification "even when VPN, incognito mode, or a tampered browser or device is used"; Smart Signals with "100+" attributes. | "1,100+ first-party data signals"; device intelligence and behavioural analysis "that spots screen sharing, remote access tools"; network analysis across shared devices, IPs and emails; "See which of the 1,100+ signals drove the AI insights score". |
| Operations | Not published; Fingerprint supplies signals to the client's own rules. | "Fine-tune risk thresholds and build highly granular rules"; AI-written rules; case management that "auto-assigns alerts, summarizes findings and maintains a complete audit trail". |
| Integration | SDKs and libraries, documentation, GitHub; free sign-up; "14 day free trial with unlimited API calls". | API-first with documentation and GitHub; "averaging 14 days from implementation to impact"; Shopify and AWS integrations; free trial. |
| Security and clients | "ISO 27001 certified" and "SOC 2 Type II compliant"; data in AWS data centres. "Trusted by 6000+ companies"; none named on the pages read. | Compliance badges: "GDPR, ISO 27001 Certified, CCPA, SOC 2, PCI DSS Compliant" (SOC 2 type not stated). Case study with tbi Bank; logos include Revolut and BNP Paribas. |
| Date read | 26 October 2026 | 26 October 2026 |
Not published or not stated by Fingerprint: operations, fraud coverage, detection signals and security and clients.
Not published or not stated by SEON: security and clients, fraud coverage, detection signals, rules and case management and integration.
Facts read on 26 October 2026 from: fingerprint.com, fingerprint.com/pricing, fingerprint.com/security; and seon.io, seon.io/pricing, seon.io/legal-and-security.
Awards follow from the published scores and cannot be bought.
From each provider's strongest criteria and published terms.
Fintechs wanting device recognition with clear self-serve prices.
Payment and fintech firms wanting a published monthly price and fast set-up.
Tell us what you need and where you operate.