How we work with clientsStart your applicationClient login
Provider profile · 2026 edition

SHIELD review 2026: scores, pricing and alternatives.

A device intelligence provider used by e-wallets and apps in Asia to stop fake accounts and fraud at sign-up, login and transaction.

Research by Buckingham Intelligence, the research unit of Buckingham Capital Consulting · Facts read 26 October 2026 · Dated copies of source pages kept · Method
2.0 / 5Buckingham Intelligence score
0Awards 2026
1Index
12 of 13Rank, Fraud Prevention Index

Short answer.

SHIELD scores 2.0 out of 5 (41 out of 100) in the Buckingham Intelligence Fraud Prevention Index 2026 and ranks 12 of 13. It is strongest for asian e-wallets and apps stopping fake accounts at sign-up and login, and its best criterion is integration at 4 out of 5. Not published or not stated on the pages read: coverage, pricing, detection signals, rules and case management and security and clients.

Awards and scores.

Scores from the Fraud Prevention Index 2026.

Fraud Prevention Index

2.0 / 541 out of 100 · rank 12 of 13

No award in the Fraud Prevention Index 2026.

SegmentScore out of 100Rank
For banks and lenders4112 of 13
For payment and e-money firms4312 of 13
For fintechs and marketplaces4011 of 13

The score out of 5 is the overall score out of 100 divided by 20. Leader goes to the top three overall, Best for to the first in each segment, and Top rated for to a score of 5 out of 5 on a criterion. Awards cannot be bought.

Strengths and watch-outs.

Where it scores best, and where to check closely, as shown in each ranking.

Strongest for

Asian e-wallets and apps stopping fake accounts at sign-up and login.

  • Integration (4/5). API, web and mobile integration and a stated time to go live; no trial.
Watch out for
  • Published pricing (0/5). Not published.
  • Detection signals (2/5). Device intelligence and device behaviour published; shared data and explanations not stated.
  • Rules and case management (2/5). Custom fraud policies published; backtesting, case management and reporting not published.
  • Security and clients (1/5). No certification published; one named regulated e-wallet client.

Published facts.

What SHIELD publishes on its own pages, read on 26 October 2026.

A device intelligence provider used by e-wallets and apps in Asia to stop fake accounts and fraud at sign-up, login and transaction. It publishes adjustable signal sensitivity and integration "in minutes". It publishes no prices or certifications on the page read.

FactWhat the provider publishes
Coverage"Add device-powered detection at signup, login, transaction, and more"; identifies "fake accounts". Scams and chargebacks not published.
PricingNot published; pricing link leads to a demo request.
Signals"Real-time device intelligence"; "Watch device behavior in real-time to flag when a good user turns bad"; "Fine-tune the sensitivity of 20+ fraud signals".
Operations"Customize fraud policies that factor in behavior across the entire user journey".
Integration"Integrate across web, mobile, and server-side environments in minutes, not weeks. Stream alerts via API and monitor everything in a unified dashboard."
Security and clientsNo certification on the page read. Testimonial from Maya; logos include TrueMoney, Razer and Alibaba.
Date read26 October 2026

Not published or not stated by SHIELD

  • Coverage. Scams and chargebacks not published.
  • Pricing. Not published.
  • Detection signals. Shared data and explanations not stated.
  • Rules and case management. Backtesting, case management and reporting not published.
  • Security and clients. No certification published.

A fact that is not published is scored as not offered or, for a fee, as if it were high. It is never estimated.

Facts read on 26 October 2026 from: shield.com.

Criterion scores.

Each score with the evidence behind it.

  • Fraud coverage: 3/5. Payment fraud, account takeover and new account fraud published; scams and chargebacks not published.
  • Published pricing: 0/5. Not published.
  • Detection signals: 2/5. Device intelligence and device behaviour published; shared data and explanations not stated.
  • Rules and case management: 2/5. Custom fraud policies published; backtesting, case management and reporting not published.
  • Integration: 4/5. API, web and mobile integration and a stated time to go live; no trial.
  • Security and clients: 1/5. No certification published; one named regulated e-wallet client.

Each criterion is scored 0 to 5 against the best published offer in the Fraud Prevention Index. 0 means not offered or not published. How it is scored

SHIELD alternatives.

The other providers in the same ranking, ordered by score.

ProviderScore out of 5RankStrongest for
SEON3.91 of 13Payment and fintech firms wanting a published monthly price and fast set-up
Stripe Radar3.02 of 13Firms already processing card payments with Stripe
Unit212.93 of 13US banks and fintechs needing fraud rules, investigations and SAR filing together
Fingerprint2.84 of 13Fintechs wanting device recognition with clear self-serve prices
Oscilar2.65 of 13US fintechs and payment firms wanting backtesting and case management together
Sardine2.66 of 13Fintechs and banks combining fraud, scams and AML in one system
Feedzai2.67 of 13Large banks needing scam prevention and onboarding risk on one platform
DataVisor2.68 of 13Banks and credit unions wanting unsupervised machine learning and case tools
BioCatch2.59 of 13Retail banks fighting scams, mule accounts and account takeover
Ravelin2.210 of 13Payment providers and online merchants fighting card fraud and chargebacks
Sift2.111 of 13Fintechs and marketplaces wanting a large shared data network
Bureau1.613 of 13Indian lenders and marketplaces stopping fake applications at onboarding

Full Fraud Prevention Index ranking

SHIELD compared.

Side by side on every criterion, fact and award.

Head-to-head comparisons cover pairs within the top five of each ranking. SHIELD is compared with its alternatives in the table above.

All comparisons

Speak to an expert.

Tell us what you need and where you operate.