How we work with clientsStart your applicationClient login
Home › Buckingham Intelligence › Providers › DataVisor
Provider profile · 2026 edition

DataVisor review 2026: scores, pricing and alternatives.

A fraud and AML platform covering account takeover, application fraud, scams and money mules, using device and behaviour signals, unsupervised machine learning and anonymised signals across industries.

Research by Buckingham Intelligence, the research unit of Buckingham Capital Consulting · Facts read 26 October 2026 · Dated copies of source pages kept · Method
2.6 / 5Buckingham Intelligence score
0Awards 2026
1Index
8 of 13Rank, Fraud Prevention Index

Short answer.

DataVisor scores 2.6 out of 5 (52 out of 100) in the Buckingham Intelligence Fraud Prevention Index 2026 and ranks 8 of 13. It is strongest for banks and credit unions wanting unsupervised machine learning and case tools, and its best criterion is fraud coverage at 4 out of 5. Not published or not stated on the pages read: coverage, pricing, security and clients, detection signals and rules and case management.

Awards and scores.

Scores from the Fraud Prevention Index 2026.

Fraud Prevention Index

2.6 / 552 out of 100 · rank 8 of 13

No award in the Fraud Prevention Index 2026.

SegmentScore out of 100Rank
For banks and lenders588 of 13
For payment and e-money firms546 of 13
For fintechs and marketplaces446 of 13

The score out of 5 is the overall score out of 100 divided by 20. Leader goes to the top three overall, Best for to the first in each segment, and Top rated for to a score of 5 out of 5 on a criterion. Awards cannot be bought.

Strengths and watch-outs.

Where it scores best, and where to check closely, as shown in each ranking.

Strongest for

Banks and credit unions wanting unsupervised machine learning and case tools.

  • Fraud coverage (4/5). Payment fraud, account takeover, application fraud and scams published; chargebacks not published.
  • Detection signals (4/5). Device, behaviour and cross-industry signals published; score explanations not stated.
  • Rules and case management (4/5). Rules, case management, reporting and SAR drafting published; backtesting not stated.
Watch out for
  • Published pricing (0/5). Not published on the pages read.
  • Integration (2/5). API references published; no SDK or trial; go-live time only in a testimonial.
  • Security and clients (0/5). No certification or named clients published.

Published facts.

What DataVisor publishes on its own pages, read on 26 October 2026.

A fraud and AML platform covering account takeover, application fraud, scams and money mules, using device and behaviour signals, unsupervised machine learning and anonymised signals across industries. It publishes rules, case management and SAR narrative drafting. It publishes no prices, certifications or named clients.

FactWhat the provider publishes
Coverage"Account Takeover, Application & Onboarding Fraud, Identity Fraud, Scams & Social Engineering, Fraud Rings & Money Mules"; serves "banking, fintech, payments". Chargebacks not published.
PricingNot published on the pages read.
Signals"Device & Behavioral Intelligence - dEdge"; "Unsupervised Machine Learning"; "anonymized signals across industries".
Operations"Rules, Features, & Workflow Automations"; "Investigations & Case Management"; "Analytics & Reporting"; "SAR Narrative Generation".
IntegrationIntegration guide and API references published; testimonial: "deploy strategies in just 15 minutes".
Security and clientsStates it meets "rigorous global standards for security, privacy, and compliance"; no certification named. No clients named on the page read.
Date read26 October 2026

Not published or not stated by DataVisor

  • Coverage. Chargebacks not published.
  • Pricing. Not published on the pages read.
  • Security and clients. No certification named; No clients named on the page read.
  • Detection signals. Score explanations not stated.
  • Rules and case management. Backtesting not stated.

A fact that is not published is scored as not offered or, for a fee, as if it were high. It is never estimated.

Facts read on 26 October 2026 from: datavisor.com.

Criterion scores.

Each score with the evidence behind it.

  • Fraud coverage: 4/5. Payment fraud, account takeover, application fraud and scams published; chargebacks not published.
  • Published pricing: 0/5. Not published on the pages read.
  • Detection signals: 4/5. Device, behaviour and cross-industry signals published; score explanations not stated.
  • Rules and case management: 4/5. Rules, case management, reporting and SAR drafting published; backtesting not stated.
  • Integration: 2/5. API references published; no SDK or trial; go-live time only in a testimonial.
  • Security and clients: 0/5. No certification or named clients published.

Each criterion is scored 0 to 5 against the best published offer in the Fraud Prevention Index. 0 means not offered or not published. How it is scored

DataVisor alternatives.

The other providers in the same ranking, ordered by score.

ProviderScore out of 5RankStrongest for
SEON3.91 of 13Payment and fintech firms wanting a published monthly price and fast set-up
Stripe Radar3.02 of 13Firms already processing card payments with Stripe
Unit212.93 of 13US banks and fintechs needing fraud rules, investigations and SAR filing together
Fingerprint2.84 of 13Fintechs wanting device recognition with clear self-serve prices
Oscilar2.65 of 13US fintechs and payment firms wanting backtesting and case management together
Sardine2.66 of 13Fintechs and banks combining fraud, scams and AML in one system
Feedzai2.67 of 13Large banks needing scam prevention and onboarding risk on one platform
BioCatch2.59 of 13Retail banks fighting scams, mule accounts and account takeover
Ravelin2.210 of 13Payment providers and online merchants fighting card fraud and chargebacks
Sift2.111 of 13Fintechs and marketplaces wanting a large shared data network
SHIELD2.012 of 13Asian e-wallets and apps stopping fake accounts at sign-up and login
Bureau1.613 of 13Indian lenders and marketplaces stopping fake applications at onboarding

Full Fraud Prevention Index ranking

DataVisor compared.

Side by side on every criterion, fact and award.

Head-to-head comparisons cover pairs within the top five of each ranking. DataVisor is compared with its alternatives in the table above.

All comparisons

Speak to an expert.

Tell us what you need and where you operate.