Provider profile · 2026 edition
Nasdaq AxiomSL review 2026: scores, pricing and alternatives.
Nasdaq's regulatory reporting platform for banks and brokerages.
WhatsApp and Telegram +44 7563 115980
[email protected]
Nasdaq's regulatory reporting platform for banks and brokerages.
Nasdaq AxiomSL scores 3.0 out of 5 (59 out of 100) in the Buckingham Intelligence Regulatory Reporting Index 2026 and ranks 5 of 12. It is strongest for banks and brokerages reporting to many regulators worldwide, with 5 out of 5 for regulator reach. Not published or not stated on the pages read: standing, pricing, report coverage and delivery.
Scores from the Regulatory Reporting Index 2026.
| Segment | Score out of 100 | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| For banks | 66 | 4 of 12 |
| For payment and e-money firms | 52 | 8 of 12 |
| For investment and crypto firms | 59 | 4 of 12 |
The score out of 5 is the overall score out of 100 divided by 20. Leader goes to the top three overall, Best for to the first in each segment, and Top rated for to a score of 5 out of 5 on a criterion. Awards cannot be bought.
Where it scores best, and where to check closely, as shown in each ranking.
Banks and brokerages reporting to many regulators worldwide.
What Nasdaq AxiomSL publishes on its own pages, read on 26 October 2026.
Nasdaq's regulatory reporting platform for banks and brokerages. It publishes the widest regulator count in this edition, SaaS delivery and data lineage with built-in validation rules. It does not publish prices, security certifications or transaction and tax reporting on the page read.
| Fact | What the provider publishes |
|---|---|
| Coverage | "Risk & Financial Regulatory Reporting" for banks and brokerages, with "reporting templates" and calculations on a single platform. |
| Reach | "Ensure compliance with 170+ regulators across 60+ jurisdictions"; "3,500+ financial institutions in 50+ countries" in the Nasdaq community. |
| Delivery | "Our fully SaaS-delivered solution ensures you have not only the latest regulatory rules"; submission in XML, XBRL and other formats "and automate the submission process". |
| Controls | "full auditability and traceability of data lineage"; "in-built regulatory validation rules, and automated alerts"; checker controls. |
| Standing | Case study with Banco Mercantil del Norte (Banorte). Security certifications not stated on the page read. |
| Pricing | Not published on the pages read. |
| Date read | 26 October 2026 |
A fact that is not published is scored as not offered or, for a fee, as if it were high. It is never estimated.
Facts read on 26 October 2026 from: nasdaq.com/products/fintech/axiomsl/….
Each score with the evidence behind it.
Each criterion is scored 0 to 5 against the best published offer in the Regulatory Reporting Index. 0 means not offered or not published. How it is scored
The other providers in the same ranking, ordered by score.
| Provider | Score out of 5 | Rank | Strongest for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regnology | 3.7 | 1 of 12 | Banks and broker-dealers reporting to many supervisors from one data model |
| TRAction | 3.4 | 2 of 12 | Smaller investment firms, brokers and money transfer firms wanting a published price |
| Taxbit | 3.2 | 3 of 12 | Crypto exchanges, wallets and payment firms filing CARF, CRS and US information returns |
| MAP FinTech | 3.0 | 4 of 12 | Brokers and investment firms needing trade and CRS/FATCA reporting together |
| CoreFiling | 2.8 | 6 of 12 | Banks and insurers filing COREP, FINREP and Solvency II returns in XBRL |
| S&P Global Cappitech | 2.8 | 7 of 12 | Investment firms and brokers reporting trades across many regimes |
| Kani Payments | 2.8 | 8 of 12 | Card issuers, e-money and payment firms filing card scheme and safeguarding reports |
| Workiva | 2.0 | 9 of 12 | US banks linking regulatory filings to board and audit reporting |
| LSEG Regulatory Reporting Solutions | 1.9 | 10 of 12 | Investment and crypto firms reporting EMIR and MiFIR trades |
| Fintellix | 1.6 | 11 of 12 | Banks in India and Asia filing central bank returns |
| Suade Labs | 0.8 | 12 of 12 | Banks wanting an open data standard behind their reporting |
Side by side on every criterion, fact and award.
Tell us what you need and where you operate.