WhatsApp and Telegram +44 7563 115980
[email protected]

A reporting platform used by banks for call reports, SEC filings and stress testing reports.
Workiva scores 2.0 out of 5 (41 out of 100) in the Buckingham Intelligence Regulatory Reporting Index 2026 and ranks 9 of 12. It is strongest for US banks linking regulatory filings to board and audit reporting, and its best criterion is security and standing at 4 out of 5. Not published or not stated on the pages read: reach, delivery, pricing, report coverage and security and standing.
Scores from the Regulatory Reporting Index 2026.
No award in the Regulatory Reporting Index 2026.
| Segment | Score out of 100 | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| For banks | 44 | 9 of 12 |
| For payment and e-money firms | 39 | 9 of 12 |
| For investment and crypto firms | 39 | 9 of 12 |
The score out of 5 is the overall score out of 100 divided by 20. Leader goes to the top three overall, Best for to the first in each segment, and Top rated for to a score of 5 out of 5 on a criterion. Awards cannot be bought.
Where it scores best, and where to check closely, as shown in each ranking.
US banks linking regulatory filings to board and audit reporting.
What Workiva publishes on its own pages, read on 26 October 2026.
A reporting platform used by banks for call reports, SEC filings and stress testing reports. It publishes the strongest security credentials among the US providers here and a choice of four hosting regions. It does not publish prices, regulator counts or validation rules.
| Fact | What the provider publishes |
|---|---|
| Coverage | Banking page lists "Statutory and regulatory : Call reports, SEC filings" and use for Reg YY, CCAR and BCBS 239 reporting. |
| Reach | US regulatory reports named; no regulator or jurisdiction count published. Data hosted in the United States, Ireland, Canada or Japan. |
| Delivery | Cloud platform hosted on AWS; "Workiva AI is built directly into our SOC 2-compliant platform". Managed reporting and onboarding time not published. |
| Controls | "Link your data from source to sign-off", creating "a clear, automated audit trail for changes"; data lineage "showing exactly where every number came from". |
| Standing | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, "ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certified" and FedRAMP Moderate. Banking page states use by "88%" of Global Systemically Important Banks, without names. |
| Pricing | Not published on the pages read. |
| Date read | 26 October 2026 |
A fact that is not published is scored as not offered or, for a fee, as if it were high. It is never estimated.
Facts read on 26 October 2026 from: workiva.com/solutions/banking, workiva.com/security.
Each score with the evidence behind it.
Each criterion is scored 0 to 5 against the best published offer in the Regulatory Reporting Index. 0 means not offered or not published. How it is scored
The other providers in the same ranking, ordered by score.
| Provider | Score out of 5 | Rank | Strongest for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regnology | 3.7 | 1 of 12 | Banks and broker-dealers reporting to many supervisors from one data model |
| TRAction | 3.4 | 2 of 12 | Smaller investment firms, brokers and money transfer firms wanting a published price |
| Taxbit | 3.2 | 3 of 12 | Crypto exchanges, wallets and payment firms filing CARF, CRS and US information returns |
| MAP FinTech | 3.0 | 4 of 12 | Brokers and investment firms needing trade and CRS/FATCA reporting together |
| Nasdaq AxiomSL | 3.0 | 5 of 12 | Banks and brokerages reporting to many regulators worldwide |
| CoreFiling | 2.8 | 6 of 12 | Banks and insurers filing COREP, FINREP and Solvency II returns in XBRL |
| S&P Global Cappitech | 2.8 | 7 of 12 | Investment firms and brokers reporting trades across many regimes |
| Kani Payments | 2.8 | 8 of 12 | Card issuers, e-money and payment firms filing card scheme and safeguarding reports |
| LSEG Regulatory Reporting Solutions | 1.9 | 10 of 12 | Investment and crypto firms reporting EMIR and MiFIR trades |
| Fintellix | 1.6 | 11 of 12 | Banks in India and Asia filing central bank returns |
| Suade Labs | 0.8 | 12 of 12 | Banks wanting an open data standard behind their reporting |
Side by side on every criterion, fact and award.
Head-to-head comparisons cover pairs within the top five of each ranking. Workiva is compared with its alternatives in the table above.
Tell us what you need and where you operate.