How we work with clientsStart your applicationClient login
Home › Buckingham Intelligence › Providers › CoreFiling
Provider profile · 2026 edition

CoreFiling review 2026: scores, pricing and alternatives.

A UK provider of software that creates and checks returns in XBRL (a standard computer format regulators use to collect returns).

Research by Buckingham Intelligence, the research unit of Buckingham Capital Consulting · Facts read 26 October 2026 · Dated copies of source pages kept · Method
2.8 / 5Buckingham Intelligence score
0Awards 2026
1Index
6 of 12Rank, Regulatory Reporting Index

Short answer.

CoreFiling scores 2.8 out of 5 (56 out of 100) in the Buckingham Intelligence Regulatory Reporting Index 2026 and ranks 6 of 12. It is strongest for banks and insurers filing COREP, FINREP and Solvency II returns in XBRL, and its best criterion is report coverage at 4 out of 5. Not published or not stated on the pages read: pricing, report coverage and delivery.

Awards and scores.

Scores from the Regulatory Reporting Index 2026.

Regulatory Reporting Index

2.8 / 556 out of 100 · rank 6 of 12

No award in the Regulatory Reporting Index 2026.

SegmentScore out of 100Rank
For banks626 of 12
For payment and e-money firms526 of 12
For investment and crypto firms556 of 12

The score out of 5 is the overall score out of 100 divided by 20. Leader goes to the top three overall, Best for to the first in each segment, and Top rated for to a score of 5 out of 5 on a criterion. Awards cannot be bought.

Strengths and watch-outs.

Where it scores best, and where to check closely, as shown in each ranking.

Strongest for

Banks and insurers filing COREP, FINREP and Solvency II returns in XBRL.

  • Report coverage (4/5). Prudential returns and tax filings published; transaction and payment reports not published.
Watch out for
  • Published pricing (0/5). Not published on the pages read.

Published facts.

What CoreFiling publishes on its own pages, read on 26 October 2026.

A UK provider of software that creates and checks returns in XBRL (a standard computer format regulators use to collect returns). It publishes support for all COREP and FINREP modules, Solvency II and tax filings, SaaS delivery and ISO 27001. It does not publish prices or transaction reporting.

FactWhat the provider publishes
Coverage"CoreFiling support all CRD IV reporting modules under COREP and FINREP"; Seahorse produces filings "such as CRD IV, Solvency II and National Specific Templates" and iXBRL tax returns to HMRC.
ReachFiling programmes of ESMA, EIOPA, the EBA, HMRC and Revenue Ireland; "direct engagement on national filing programmes across the UK, Central Europe and Asia Pacific".
Delivery"Delivered as SaaS you are always up-to-date"; "On site and hosted solutions"; APIs for embedding.
Controls"All outputs from Seahorse are validated against all the relevant technical standards and the filing rules specific to each reporting programme"; EBA data quality rules.
Standing"CoreFiling's software is ISO 27001 certified and XBRL certified"; describes the FCA and PRA as using CoreFiling "as their sole XBRL solution partner".
PricingNot published on the pages read.
Date read26 October 2026

Not published or not stated by CoreFiling

  • Pricing. Not published on the pages read.
  • Report coverage. Transaction and payment reports not published.
  • Delivery. Managed reporting and onboarding not published.

A fact that is not published is scored as not offered or, for a fee, as if it were high. It is never estimated.

Facts read on 26 October 2026 from: corefiling.com, corefiling.com/crd-iv-xbrl-reporting, corefiling.com/seahorse-saas.

Criterion scores.

Each score with the evidence behind it.

  • Report coverage: 4/5. Prudential returns and tax filings published; transaction and payment reports not published.
  • Published pricing: 0/5. Not published on the pages read.
  • Regulator reach: 3/5. Named European and UK authorities, with filing programmes in Asia Pacific.
  • Delivery: 3/5. SaaS with rule updates and on-site option; managed reporting and onboarding not published.
  • Security and standing: 3/5. ISO 27001 published; regulators named as users, not regulated firms.
  • Data controls: 3/5. Validation against technical standards and filing rules published; lineage and reconciliation not published.

Each criterion is scored 0 to 5 against the best published offer in the Regulatory Reporting Index. 0 means not offered or not published. How it is scored

CoreFiling alternatives.

The other providers in the same ranking, ordered by score.

ProviderScore out of 5RankStrongest for
Regnology3.71 of 12Banks and broker-dealers reporting to many supervisors from one data model
TRAction3.42 of 12Smaller investment firms, brokers and money transfer firms wanting a published price
Taxbit3.23 of 12Crypto exchanges, wallets and payment firms filing CARF, CRS and US information returns
MAP FinTech3.04 of 12Brokers and investment firms needing trade and CRS/FATCA reporting together
Nasdaq AxiomSL3.05 of 12Banks and brokerages reporting to many regulators worldwide
S&P Global Cappitech2.87 of 12Investment firms and brokers reporting trades across many regimes
Kani Payments2.88 of 12Card issuers, e-money and payment firms filing card scheme and safeguarding reports
Workiva2.09 of 12US banks linking regulatory filings to board and audit reporting
LSEG Regulatory Reporting Solutions1.910 of 12Investment and crypto firms reporting EMIR and MiFIR trades
Fintellix1.611 of 12Banks in India and Asia filing central bank returns
Suade Labs0.812 of 12Banks wanting an open data standard behind their reporting

Full Regulatory Reporting Index ranking

CoreFiling compared.

Side by side on every criterion, fact and award.

Head-to-head comparisons cover pairs within the top five of each ranking. CoreFiling is compared with its alternatives in the table above.

All comparisons

Speak to an expert.

Tell us what you need and where you operate.