How we work with clientsStart your applicationClient login
Home › Buckingham Intelligence › Comparisons › Solaris vs Swan
Comparison · 2026 edition

Solaris vs Swan: banking as a service compared 2026.

Solaris and Swan side by side in the Banking-as-a-Service and Sponsor Banks Index 2026: scores, evidence, published facts and awards.

Research by Buckingham Intelligence, the research unit of Buckingham Capital Consulting · Facts read 26 October 2026 · Dated copies of source pages kept · Method
3.9 / 5Solaris
3.9 / 5Swan
SwanHigher overall
6Criteria compared

Short answer.

In the Banking-as-a-Service and Sponsor Banks Index, Swan scores higher overall: 3.9 out of 5 (78 out of 100) against 3.9 (77), ranking 1 and 2 of 11. Solaris scores higher for fintechs launching accounts and cards and regulated payment and e-money firms; Swan scores higher for software platforms embedding finance.

Scores side by side.

Overall and segment scores out of 100, and the score out of 5.

ScoreSolarisSwan
Score out of 53.93.9
Score out of 1007778
Overall rank2 of 111 of 11
For fintechs launching accounts and cards (out of 100)82, rank 179, rank 2
For software platforms embedding finance (out of 100)68, rank 377, rank 1
For regulated payment and e-money firms (out of 100)81, rank 179, rank 2
TypeGerman bank for embedded financeEmbedded banking under a French e-money licence

Criterion by criterion.

Each score with the evidence behind it.

CriterionSolarisSwan
Product range5/5
Accounts, cards, payments and lending all published.
4/5
Accounts, cards and SEPA payments published; lending not published.
Published pricing0/5
Not published on the pages read.
2/5
Card and set-up fees published; plan price only as "starting from".
Licence and deposit protection5/5
Own full banking licence with regulators named and deposit protection stated.
4/5
Own e-money licence with register number and named safeguarding banks; e-money is safeguarded, not deposit-insured.
Compliance support5/5
Solaris states it carries regulatory compliance and onboarding checks for partners.
4/5
Swan states it carries the regulatory and fraud risk; transaction monitoring not described.
Integration3/5
API and stated launch time; sandbox and ready-made screens not published on the pages read.
5/5
API, sandbox, no-code screens and a stated launch time.
Markets4/5
Local IBANs in three countries with EEA coverage.
4/5
31 EEA countries.

Each criterion is scored 0 to 5 against the best published offer in the Banking-as-a-Service and Sponsor Banks Index. 0 means not offered or not published. How it is scored

Published facts.

What each provider publishes on its own pages, read on 26 October 2026.

FactSolarisSwan
Product range"Offer accounts, payment cards, consumer lending, and compliant ID solutions"; cards "Branded credit, debit and prepaid"; payments; digital asset custody; KYC platform.Accounts with IBANs starting FR, DE, ES, NL and IT; virtual IBANs; physical, virtual and Apple Pay or Google Pay cards; SEPA transfers and SEPA Direct Debit. Lending not described.
PricingNot published on the pages read.Sandbox free; Swan on demand "Starting from 2990€/m"; Enterprise custom; non-euro card payments 2%; physical cards 5€ each; no set-up fees.
Licence and deposit protectionSolaris SE holds a "full German banking license" under the European Central Bank and BaFin; "all customer deposits are ECB-insured" (Solaris's wording).Licensed electronic money institution authorised by the ACPR (REGAFI 86245) on 04/06/2020; client funds safeguarded at BNP Paribas and Natixis.
Compliance supportSolaris "handles all regulatory complexities, continuously maintaining compliance"; "three-lines-of-defense risk management framework"; acts as "your dedicated regulatory anchor"."No banking license required"; clients do not need an internal compliance team; "Swan takes on all the risk for you." KYC and onboarding listed in the sandbox.
Integration"modular REST APIs, real-time data webhooks"; partners can "go live in days, not years".Sandbox with API explorer, Postman collection and event simulator; "#nocode interfaces let you create your white-labeled MVP in minutes"; "launch in weeks, not months".
Markets"local IBANs in Germany, France, and Italy"; expansion "across the EEA".Services across the EEA; FAQ lists 31 countries.
Date read26 October 202626 October 2026

Not published or not stated by Solaris: pricing and integration.

Not published or not stated by Swan: product range, compliance support and integration.

Facts read on 26 October 2026 from: solarisgroup.com/en/why-solaris, support.solarisgroup.com/hc/en-us/articles/…; and swan.io/pricing, swan.io/use-cases/fintech, swan.io/faq.

Awards 2026.

Awards follow from the published scores and cannot be bought.

Solaris
Leader 2026Best for fintechs launching accounts and cards 2026Best for regulated payment and e-money firms 2026Top rated for product range 2026Top rated for licence and deposit protection 2026Top rated for compliance support 2026
Swan
Leader 2026Best for software platforms embedding finance 2026Top rated for integration 2026

Who each suits.

From each provider's strongest criteria and published terms.

Solaris suits

European fintechs wanting a licensed bank that carries the compliance work.

  • Product range (5/5). Accounts, cards, payments and lending all published.
  • Licence and deposit protection (5/5). Own full banking licence with regulators named and deposit protection stated.
  • Compliance support (5/5). Solaris states it carries regulatory compliance and onboarding checks for partners.

Solaris full profile

Swan suits

European software platforms wanting accounts and cards fast, with no-code screens.

  • Integration (5/5). API, sandbox, no-code screens and a stated launch time.

Swan full profile

Speak to an expert.

Tell us what you need and where you operate.