WhatsApp and Telegram +44 7563 115980
[email protected]

A global wealth platform with over US$2.5 trillion in assets on platform, used by large institutions such as Vanguard and Colonial First State.
FNZ scores 0.8 out of 5 (15 out of 100) in the Buckingham Intelligence Wealth and Brokerage Infrastructure Index 2026 and ranks 11 of 11. It is strongest for large institutions replacing several wealth platforms with one, and its best criterion is asset range at 1 out of 5. Not published or not stated on the pages read: integration, regulatory standing, asset range and published pricing.
Scores from the Wealth and Brokerage Infrastructure Index 2026.
No award in the Wealth and Brokerage Infrastructure Index 2026.
| Segment | Score out of 100 | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| For fintech apps and neobanks | 15 | 11 of 11 |
| For banks and wealth managers | 14 | 11 of 11 |
| For brokers expanding abroad | 15 | 11 of 11 |
The score out of 5 is the overall score out of 100 divided by 20. Leader goes to the top three overall, Best for to the first in each segment, and Top rated for to a score of 5 out of 5 on a criterion. Awards cannot be bought.
Where it scores best, and where to check closely, as shown in each ranking.
Large institutions replacing several wealth platforms with one.
What FNZ publishes on its own pages, read on 26 October 2026.
A global wealth platform with over US$2.5 trillion in assets on platform, used by large institutions such as Vanguard and Colonial First State. Its homepage publishes scale and client stories but not its asset list, licences, markets, integration route or protection terms.
| Fact | What the provider publishes |
|---|---|
| Scale | "over US$2.5 trillion in assets on platform (AoP)"; "we empower nearly 30 million people across all wealth segments". |
| Model | "a global, end-to-end wealth management platform that integrates modern technology, business and investment operations. All in a regulated financial institution". |
| Clients | Vanguard and Colonial First State named in client stories. |
| Integration | "a unified, modular platform that consolidates fragmented systems"; no API or launch time published on the page read. |
| Regulatory standing | Regulator and licence numbers not named on the page read. |
| Date read | 26 October 2026 |
A fact that is not published is scored as not offered or, for a fee, as if it were high. It is never estimated.
Facts read on 26 October 2026 from: fnz.com.
Each score with the evidence behind it.
Each criterion is scored 0 to 5 against the best published offer in the Wealth and Brokerage Infrastructure Index. 0 means not offered or not published. How it is scored
The other providers in the same ranking, ordered by score.
| Provider | Score out of 5 | Rank | Strongest for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interactive Brokers | 4.4 | 1 of 11 | Brokers wanting the widest market access with published fees |
| Alpaca | 4.2 | 2 of 11 | Fintech apps wanting US shares, options and crypto through one API |
| Saxo | 3.5 | 3 of 11 | Banks and wealth managers wanting the widest instrument list |
| Upvest | 3.1 | 4 of 11 | European fintechs launching investing across many countries |
| Apex Fintech Solutions | 3.1 | 5 of 11 | US fintechs wanting a sandbox and a branded app in weeks |
| WealthKernel | 3.1 | 6 of 11 | UK and EU firms wanting tax wrappers and full investor protection |
| DriveWealth | 3.0 | 7 of 11 | Global apps wanting fractional US shares and funds |
| Tiger Brokers | 2.9 | 8 of 11 | Licensed brokers in Hong Kong and Singapore wanting US and Asian markets |
| Seccl | 2.2 | 9 of 11 | UK advisers and fintechs wanting ready-made portals and pensions |
| lemon.markets | 1.9 | 10 of 11 | German and EU fintechs wanting a BaFin-licensed brokerage API |
Side by side on every criterion, fact and award.
Head-to-head comparisons cover pairs within the top five of each ranking. FNZ is compared with its alternatives in the table above.
Tell us what you need and where you operate.