How we work with clientsStart your applicationClient login
Provider profile · 2026 edition

FNZ review 2026: scores, pricing and alternatives.

A global wealth platform with over US$2.5 trillion in assets on platform, used by large institutions such as Vanguard and Colonial First State.

Research by Buckingham Intelligence, the research unit of Buckingham Capital Consulting · Facts read 26 October 2026 · Dated copies of source pages kept · Method
0.8 / 5Buckingham Intelligence score
0Awards 2026
1Index
11 of 11Rank, Wealth and Brokerage Infrastructure Index

Short answer.

FNZ scores 0.8 out of 5 (15 out of 100) in the Buckingham Intelligence Wealth and Brokerage Infrastructure Index 2026 and ranks 11 of 11. It is strongest for large institutions replacing several wealth platforms with one, and its best criterion is asset range at 1 out of 5. Not published or not stated on the pages read: integration, regulatory standing, asset range and published pricing.

Awards and scores.

Scores from the Wealth and Brokerage Infrastructure Index 2026.

Wealth and Brokerage Infrastructure Index

0.8 / 515 out of 100 · rank 11 of 11

No award in the Wealth and Brokerage Infrastructure Index 2026.

SegmentScore out of 100Rank
For fintech apps and neobanks1511 of 11
For banks and wealth managers1411 of 11
For brokers expanding abroad1511 of 11

The score out of 5 is the overall score out of 100 divided by 20. Leader goes to the top three overall, Best for to the first in each segment, and Top rated for to a score of 5 out of 5 on a criterion. Awards cannot be bought.

Strengths and watch-outs.

Where it scores best, and where to check closely, as shown in each ranking.

Strongest for

Large institutions replacing several wealth platforms with one.

  • Asset range (1/5). "A universe of investment products" stated; types not listed.
  • Regulatory standing (1/5). Regulated status stated without a regulator or number.
  • Market reach (1/5). Global platform stated; no country count.
  • Integration and launch (1/5). Modular platform stated; no API, sandbox or launch time.
Watch out for
  • Asset range (1/5). "A universe of investment products" stated; types not listed.
  • Published pricing (0/5). Not published.
  • Regulatory standing (1/5). Regulated status stated without a regulator or number.
  • Market reach (1/5). Global platform stated; no country count.
  • Integration and launch (1/5). Modular platform stated; no API, sandbox or launch time.
  • Asset protection and security (0/5). Not published.

Published facts.

What FNZ publishes on its own pages, read on 26 October 2026.

A global wealth platform with over US$2.5 trillion in assets on platform, used by large institutions such as Vanguard and Colonial First State. Its homepage publishes scale and client stories but not its asset list, licences, markets, integration route or protection terms.

FactWhat the provider publishes
Scale"over US$2.5 trillion in assets on platform (AoP)"; "we empower nearly 30 million people across all wealth segments".
Model"a global, end-to-end wealth management platform that integrates modern technology, business and investment operations. All in a regulated financial institution".
ClientsVanguard and Colonial First State named in client stories.
Integration"a unified, modular platform that consolidates fragmented systems"; no API or launch time published on the page read.
Regulatory standingRegulator and licence numbers not named on the page read.
Date read26 October 2026

Not published or not stated by FNZ

  • Integration. No API or launch time published on the page read.
  • Regulatory standing. Regulator and licence numbers not named on the page read.
  • Asset range. Types not listed.
  • Published pricing. Not published.
  • Regulatory standing. Regulated status stated without a regulator or number.

A fact that is not published is scored as not offered or, for a fee, as if it were high. It is never estimated.

Facts read on 26 October 2026 from: fnz.com.

Criterion scores.

Each score with the evidence behind it.

  • Asset range: 1/5. "A universe of investment products" stated; types not listed.
  • Published pricing: 0/5. Not published.
  • Regulatory standing: 1/5. Regulated status stated without a regulator or number.
  • Market reach: 1/5. Global platform stated; no country count.
  • Integration and launch: 1/5. Modular platform stated; no API, sandbox or launch time.
  • Asset protection and security: 0/5. Not published.

Each criterion is scored 0 to 5 against the best published offer in the Wealth and Brokerage Infrastructure Index. 0 means not offered or not published. How it is scored

FNZ alternatives.

The other providers in the same ranking, ordered by score.

ProviderScore out of 5RankStrongest for
Interactive Brokers4.41 of 11Brokers wanting the widest market access with published fees
Alpaca4.22 of 11Fintech apps wanting US shares, options and crypto through one API
Saxo3.53 of 11Banks and wealth managers wanting the widest instrument list
Upvest3.14 of 11European fintechs launching investing across many countries
Apex Fintech Solutions3.15 of 11US fintechs wanting a sandbox and a branded app in weeks
WealthKernel3.16 of 11UK and EU firms wanting tax wrappers and full investor protection
DriveWealth3.07 of 11Global apps wanting fractional US shares and funds
Tiger Brokers2.98 of 11Licensed brokers in Hong Kong and Singapore wanting US and Asian markets
Seccl2.29 of 11UK advisers and fintechs wanting ready-made portals and pensions
lemon.markets1.910 of 11German and EU fintechs wanting a BaFin-licensed brokerage API

Full Wealth and Brokerage Infrastructure Index ranking

FNZ compared.

Side by side on every criterion, fact and award.

Head-to-head comparisons cover pairs within the top five of each ranking. FNZ is compared with its alternatives in the table above.

All comparisons

Speak to an expert.

Tell us what you need and where you operate.