MiCA and crypto EU · April 2026
[email protected]
+44 7563 115980 (phone and WhatsApp)
MiCA CASP authorisation is the EU licence for crypto-asset services, granted by one home Member State’s authority and passported across the EU. Capital is €50,000, €125,000 or €150,000 by class.
Any legal person providing a crypto-asset service to clients in the EU needs MiCA authorisation, unless it is a bank, investment firm or other financial entity using the notification route. The regulated services are:
Firms outside the EU may serve EU clients only where the client approached them on its own initiative. Issuers of stablecoins fall under separate MiCA titles; see stablecoin licensing.
MiCA does not apply to crypto-assets that are unique and not fungible with other crypto-assets, or to crypto-assets that qualify as financial instruments, deposits or funds, which stay under their own EU laws (article 2). ESMA has published guidelines on when a crypto-asset qualifies as a financial instrument.
| Class | Services | Minimum capital |
|---|---|---|
| Class 1 | Execution of orders, placing, transfer services, reception and transmission of orders, advice, portfolio management | €50,000 |
| Class 2 | Class 1 services plus custody and administration, and exchange for funds or other crypto-assets | €125,000 |
| Class 3 | Class 2 services plus operating a trading platform | €150,000 |
Under Article 67 the safeguards must at all times equal the higher of the class minimum and one quarter of the previous year’s fixed overheads, reviewed every year; a new firm uses the projected overheads for its first twelve months. They may be held as Common Equity Tier 1 own funds or as an insurance policy or comparable guarantee covering the EU territories served. A Class 2 exchange projecting €1.2 million of fixed overheads therefore needs €300,000, not €125,000.
From submission to the regulator's decision, for a complete application.
Safeguarding, operating and settlement accounts opened alongside the application, so the business can trade once authorised.
We assemble your team: an EU-resident director and managers.
Tell us where you are and where you want to be.
[email protected]
+44 7563 115980 (phone and WhatsApp)
Fees are national: Malta charges €10,000 to €25,000 to apply. Decisions follow within 40 working days of a complete file; plan for three to five months.
Exchanges, brokers, custodians and trading platforms serving EU clients need MiCA authorisation in one home Member State, and the choice of that state shapes fees, pace and supervision.
Before anything is drafted we advise on whether this is the right authorisation for the business, or whether another route would serve it better.
Seven steps from choosing a home state to serving the whole EU. MiCA periods are as legislated; preparation times are our planning figures.
The registered office must be in a Member State where at least part of the services are provided, so the home state is where real operations will sit. MiCA sets no EU-level fee; each authority charges its own:
| Home state | Application charge | Annual charge | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Malta (MFSA) | €10,000 Class 1; €20,000 Class 2; €25,000 Class 3 | €10,000, €25,000 or €50,000 by class, plus €2,000 per service and 0.05% of transaction volume capped at €250,000 | Highest class applies; the first annual fee is prorated |
| Netherlands (AFM) | €200 per hour of AFM work, up to €100,000 | Ongoing supervision costs charged annually | Fee regulation in force from 22 September 2026 |
| Ireland (Central Bank) | Not set out in the levy regulations | €30,000 levy, prorated in the year of authorisation | 10 CASPs in the 2025 levy population |
| Lithuania (Bank of Lithuania) | State fee under Government Resolution No 1458 | Annual contribution set by Board resolution | Transitional period ended on 1 January 2026 |
On 10 July 2025 the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published a peer review of the MFSA’s authorisation of a CASP. It found a good level of resources and engagement, but also that some material issues were not fully resolved when the authorisation was granted and some risk areas were not adequately assessed. ESMA asked every national authority authorising CASPs to pay particular attention to business growth, conflicts of interest, governance and intragroup arrangements, ICT architecture, Web3 and decentralised products, and the promotion of unregulated services.
Those are the areas where applications now attract the most questions in every home state. We address each one in the application itself, which shortens the assessment and keeps the clock running.
Credit institutions, investment firms, e-money institutions and certain other financial entities can provide crypto-asset services under Article 60 by notifying their authority instead of applying for a CASP licence. The notification must be made at least 40 working days before the services start, and the authority checks completeness within 20 working days. In the Netherlands the AFM charges €200 an hour, up to €50,000, to handle such a notification.
An EMI that wants to run an exchange therefore needs full CASP authorisation.
Regulator charges, capital and required roles, with Malta as the worked example because its fees are fully legislated. Professional fees are excluded.
ESMA keeps an interim register of authorised CASPs, which is the authoritative source for who holds a MiCA licence. National figures show how concentrated the market is: Ireland’s levy population for 2025 counts 10 CASPs, each paying a €30,000 levy under the 2026 regulations. The ESMA peer review of July 2025 is the clearest statement of what authorities now test before granting.
After authorisation. The authority withdraws an authorisation not used within 12 months, or where the CASP has provided no crypto-asset services for nine consecutive months (article 64). Anyone deciding to acquire a qualifying holding, or to increase it to 20%, 30% or 50%, notifies the authority in writing, which assesses the acquisition within 60 working days of acknowledging receipt (article 83). Under DAC8, from 1 January 2026 reporting providers collect information on their users’ transactions and report it to their tax authority the following year.
MiCA allowed Member States to let firms already operating under national regimes continue for a transitional period, up to 1 July 2026 at the latest. That period has now ended everywhere; some states ended it sooner, Lithuania on 1 January 2026. A provider without MiCA authorisation or a valid notification must have wound down its EU business, and national authorities are enforcing.
Member states set their own periods: six months in the Netherlands, Finland, Latvia, Hungary, Slovenia and Poland; nine months in Sweden; 12 months in Germany, Ireland, Greece, Austria, Lithuania and Slovakia; up to 18 months elsewhere. ESMA’s statement of 17 April 2026 says any entity providing crypto-asset services to EU clients without MiCA authorisation after 1 July 2026 is in breach of EU law and must cease.
Wind-down plans should move clients’ assets to an authorised CASP or a self-hosted wallet, with prior notice to clients. Firms outside the EU may not solicit EU clients, including business clients, except under the narrow reverse solicitation exception, and custody may not be delegated to entities that are not authorised CASPs.
A CASP needs client fund accounts with a credit institution, kept separate from its own funds, and operating accounts in the markets it serves. We open these alongside the application, ready for client funds to be placed by the end of the next business day. See banking and payment processing.
You will need a management team that runs the business from the EU, with at least one director living in the EU.
We prepare MiCA CASP authorisation applications, file them with the home-state authority and manage each one to approval, from our offices in London and New York.
Authorisation is the first stage. We can also arrange what the regulator expects to be in place alongside it: the local directors and compliance officer, bank accounts, payment processing and the first year of compliance.
The one where you have, or will build, real operations: the registered office must be there, with effective management in the EU and an EU-resident director. Fees differ widely, from €10,000 to €25,000 in Malta to up to €100,000 with the Dutch AFM.
The authority checks completeness within 25 working days and decides within 40 working days of a complete application, with up to 20 working days of pause for questions. We plan for three to five months after submission.
€50,000 for Class 1, €125,000 for Class 2 and €150,000 for Class 3, or one quarter of the previous year’s fixed overheads if higher.
Only through an EU entity holding MiCA authorisation, or where the client approaches it on its own initiative. Groups serving both markets hold EU authorisation and UK permissions.
It ended across the EU by 1 July 2026, and earlier in some states, such as Lithuania on 1 January 2026. Providers without authorisation must have wound down their EU business.
No. They can notify their authority at least 40 working days before starting crypto-asset services; the authority checks completeness within 20 working days.
Authorisation as a crypto-asset service provider under Regulation (EU) 2023/1114, granted by one home member state’s authority and passported to every other member state by notification.
Only through an EU company with its registered office in a member state where it provides services, effective management in the EU and at least one EU-resident director. Without that, it may serve EU clients only on their own initiative.
No. By notification an EMI may provide only custody and transfer services for the e-money tokens it issues; an exchange needs full CASP authorisation.
Yes, subject to the authority’s assessment. Acquiring a qualifying holding, or increasing it to 20%, 30% or 50%, is notified in writing and assessed within 60 working days of acknowledgement.
Not crypto-assets that are unique and not fungible with other crypto-assets. Crypto-assets that qualify as financial instruments are also outside MiCA.
Cited in the sections above
Key dates. Sources: ESMA: Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation; Banco de España: MiCAR and the issue of ARTs and EMTs; EBA: travel rule guidelines under Regulation (EU) 2023/1113; EBA: DORA replaces PSD2 major incident reporting from 17 January 2025; European Commission: DAC8; AMLA: the new AML/CFT framework applies from 10 July 2027
Who needs authorisation. Sources: MiCA article 2: scope
Capital by class. Sources: MiCA Article 67: prudential requirements; Markets in Crypto-Assets Act (Fees) Regulations, S.L. 647.01
Choosing the home state. Sources: Markets in Crypto-Assets Act (Fees) Regulations, S.L. 647.01; Regulation on the funding of financial supervision (one-off acts), version in force from 22 September 2026; Central Bank of Ireland: funding strategy and guide to the 2026 industry funding regulations (August 2026); Bank of Lithuania: authorisation of crypto-asset service providers
What the authority requires. Sources: MiCA Article 59: authorisation; MiCA Article 70: safekeeping of clients’ crypto-assets and funds; Bank of Lithuania: authorisation of crypto-asset service providers
How authorities now assess files. Sources: ESMA: peer review of the MFSA’s CASP authorisation (10 July 2025)
The notification route for regulated firms. Sources: Bank of Lithuania: authorisation of crypto-asset service providers; Regulation on the funding of financial supervision (one-off acts), version in force from 22 September 2026
The notification route for regulated firms. Sources: MiCA article 60: crypto-asset services by certain financial entities
What it costs in the first year. Sources: Markets in Crypto-Assets Act (Fees) Regulations, S.L. 647.01; Regulation on the funding of financial supervision (one-off acts), version in force from 22 September 2026; Central Bank of Ireland: funding strategy and guide to the 2026 industry funding regulations (August 2026); MiCA Article 67: prudential requirements
Authorisation data. Sources: Central Bank of Ireland: funding strategy and guide to the 2026 industry funding regulations (August 2026); ESMA: peer review of the MFSA’s CASP authorisation (10 July 2025); ESMA: Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation
The end of transition. Sources: ESMA statement on the end of transitional periods under MiCA; Bank of Lithuania: authorisation of crypto-asset service providers
The end of transition. Sources: ESMA: grandfathering periods decided by member states, article 143(3); ESMA statement on the end of transitional periods under MiCA (17 April 2026)
Custody, anti-money laundering and stablecoin payments. Sources: MiCA article 75: custody and administration; EBA: travel rule guidelines under Regulation (EU) 2023/1113; AMLA: the new AML/CFT framework applies from 10 July 2027; MiCA article 48: e-money token issuers; EBA: actions at the end of the transition under its no-action letter on PSD2 and MiCA (12 February 2026)
This guide is general information, not legal advice. Requirements and fees change, and the regulator’s own publications take precedence.
MiCA and crypto EU · April 2026
MiCA and crypto EU · August 2026
MiCA and crypto EU · May 2026