How we work with clientsStart your applicationClient login
Home › Buckingham Intelligence › Comparisons › Marqeta vs Nium
Comparison · 2026 edition

Marqeta vs Nium: card issuing compared 2026.

Marqeta and Nium side by side in the Card Issuing Index 2026: scores, evidence, published facts and awards.

Research by Buckingham Intelligence, the research unit of Buckingham Capital Consulting · Facts read 26 October 2026 · Dated copies of source pages kept · Method
3.1 / 5Marqeta
3.0 / 5Nium
MarqetaHigher overall
6Criteria compared

Short answer.

In the Card Issuing Index, Marqeta scores higher overall: 3.1 out of 5 (63 out of 100) against 3.0 (61), ranking 2 and 3 of 11. Marqeta scores higher for expense and B2B payment platforms and banks and lenders; they tie for fintechs and e-money firms.

Scores side by side.

Overall and segment scores out of 100, and the score out of 5.

ScoreMarqetaNium
Score out of 53.13.0
Score out of 1006361
Overall rank2 of 113 of 11
For fintechs and e-money firms (out of 100)62, rank 262, rank 3
For expense and B2B payment platforms (out of 100)59, rank 258, rank 3
For banks and lenders (out of 100)67, rank 263, rank 4
TypeCard issuing processorCard issuing platform

Criterion by criterion.

Each score with the evidence behind it.

CriterionMarqetaNium
Card range5/5
Virtual, physical, tokenised, debit, prepaid and credit cards published.
3/5
Virtual, physical, prepaid and tokenised cards published; debit and credit not specified.
Published pricing0/5
Not published on the pages read.
0/5
Not published on the pages read.
Issuing countries5/5
40+ countries published; no country list.
3/5
30+ markets published.
Integration3/5
API and private sandbox; no self-serve sign-up or launch time published.
5/5
API, sandbox, self-serve sign-up and a stated time to production.
Regulatory standing3/5
SOC 2 Type 2 published; PCI DSS without level and an e-money licence without a named regulator count as half.
4/5
Own licences with numbers and SOC 2 Type 2; PCI DSS without level counts as half.
Programme support2/5
Programme management and UK and EU BIN sponsorship published; KYC, fraud and dispute services not described on the pages read.
3/5
Own issuing, programme management and fraud protections published; KYC and dispute services not described on the pages read.

Each criterion is scored 0 to 5 against the best published offer in the Card Issuing Index. 0 means not offered or not published. How it is scored

Published facts.

What each provider publishes on its own pages, read on 26 October 2026.

FactMarqetaNium
Card range"Physical, virtual, and tokenized cards"; prepaid and debit programmes, and credit programmes for consumers and businesses; flexible credentials let one card work as debit, credit or buy now pay later.Physical, virtual and digital cards; prepaid, embedded and white-label programmes; tokenisation and 3DS; Visa, Mastercard and Discover. Debit and credit not specified.
PricingNot published on the pages read.Not published on the pages read.
Issuing countries"40+ countries certified to operate"; no country list on the pages read."Operate custom card programs in 30+ markets with no BIN sponsor"; country tables for Australia, the EEA, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Singapore, the UK and the USA.
IntegrationOpen APIs with 370+ endpoints, real-time webhooks and a private sandbox for testing and simulating transactions; no self-serve sign-up or launch time published.Self-serve Nium Web Portal sign-up and sandbox; SDKs for Node, Python, Go and Java; "Most teams reach production in under two weeks."
Regulatory standingTrust Center lists ISO/IEC 27001, PCI DSS (level not stated), PCI 3DS, SOC 1 Type 2 and SOC 2 Type 2. States it is not a bank; bank partners not named. TransactPay, now acquired, is described as an "E-Money Institution and BIN Sponsor" in the UK and EEA; regulator not named.Licences page lists FCA e-money and payment authorisations (refs 901024, 900800, 721549), a Bank of Lithuania EMI licence (No. 14), MAS Major Payment Institution PS20200276 and US money transmitter licences (NMLS 1528562). Badges for PCI DSS (level not stated), SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO/IEC 27001.
Programme supportProgramme management support "from planning through execution"; UK and EU card programme management through TransactPay. Platform figures: $400B+ processed in the four quarters to 30 June 2026 and 99.99% uptime in 2025. Named clients include Klarna and Affirm.Issues without a separate BIN sponsor; card programme management API; tokenisation and 3DS protections. Named clients include Aspire, AXA Bank and Amadeus.
Date read26 October 202626 October 2026

Not published or not stated by Marqeta: pricing, integration, regulatory standing and programme support.

Not published or not stated by Nium: pricing, regulatory standing and programme support.

Facts read on 26 October 2026 from: marqeta.com/platform/card-issuing, trust.marqeta.com, marqeta.com/blog/…, marqeta.com/uk/demystifying-cards-guide/…; and nium.com/products/issue-cards, nium.com/developers, nium.com/licenses, nium.com/newsroom/nium-us-card-issuance.

Awards 2026.

Awards follow from the published scores and cannot be bought.

Marqeta
Leader 2026Top rated for card range 2026Top rated for issuing countries 2026
Nium
Leader 2026Top rated for integration 2026

Who each suits.

From each provider's strongest criteria and published terms.

Marqeta suits

Large programmes needing high volumes across many countries.

  • Card range (5/5). Virtual, physical, tokenised, debit, prepaid and credit cards published.
  • Issuing countries (5/5). 40+ countries published; no country list.

Marqeta full profile

Nium suits

Travel and B2B platforms issuing in Asia Pacific, Europe and the US.

  • Integration (5/5). API, sandbox, self-serve sign-up and a stated time to production.

Nium full profile

Speak to an expert.

Tell us what you need and where you operate.