How we work with clientsStart your applicationClient login
Home › Buckingham Intelligence › Comparisons › Castellum.AI vs dilisense
Comparison · 2026 edition

Castellum.AI vs dilisense: sanctions screening compared 2026.

Castellum.AI and dilisense side by side in the Sanctions and Adverse Media Screening Index 2026: scores, evidence, published facts and awards.

Research by Buckingham Intelligence, the research unit of Buckingham Capital Consulting · Facts read 26 October 2026 · Dated copies of source pages kept · Method
3.8 / 5Castellum.AI
4.0 / 5dilisense
dilisenseHigher overall
6Criteria compared

Short answer.

In the Sanctions and Adverse Media Screening Index, dilisense scores higher overall: 4.0 out of 5 (80 out of 100) against 3.8 (76), ranking 2 and 3 of 12. Castellum.AI scores higher for banks and lenders; dilisense scores higher for payment and e-money firms and crypto firms.

Scores side by side.

Overall and segment scores out of 100, and the score out of 5.

ScoreCastellum.AIdilisense
Score out of 53.84.0
Score out of 1007680
Overall rank3 of 122 of 12
For payment and e-money firms (out of 100)72, rank 484, rank 2
For banks and lenders (out of 100)87, rank 270, rank 4
For crypto firms (out of 100)70, rank 486, rank 2
TypeSanctions, PEP and adverse media screening platformSanctions, PEP and adverse media screening API

Criterion by criterion.

Each score with the evidence behind it.

CriterionCastellum.AIdilisense
Screening coverage5/5
Sanctions, PEP, adverse media, ongoing monitoring and transaction screening all published.
5/5
Sanctions, PEP, adverse media, ongoing monitoring and transaction-time screening published.
Published pricing0/5
Tiers shown without prices.
5/5
Per-call prices, a monthly plan with included volume and overage price published.
Data depth and freshness5/5
1,700+ watchlists published, updated every five minutes.
5/5
10,000+ sources and 190+ jurisdictions published, updated hourly.
Matching and alert handling5/5
Fuzzy and transliteration matching, 100+ languages, adjustable thresholds and automated alert review published.
3/5
Fuzzy matching and adjustable thresholds published; cross-language matching and automated alert review not published.
Integration3/5
API and web tool published; no batch upload or self-serve sign-up on the pages read.
5/5
API, Excel batch, free web search and free trial published.
Security and clients4/5
SOC 2 stated with a named regulated bank client; ISO 27001 not published.
0/5
No security certification published.

Each criterion is scored 0 to 5 against the best published offer in the Sanctions and Adverse Media Screening Index. 0 means not offered or not published. How it is scored

Published facts.

What each provider publishes on its own pages, read on 26 October 2026.

FactCastellum.AIdilisense
CoverageProducts: Sanctions & PEPs Screening, AI-Powered Adverse Media Screening, KYC/KYB Onboarding, Real-Time Monitoring and Transaction Screening."Sanctions, PEP, criminal and adverse media" screening, Ongoing Monitoring with "instant alerts when sanctions or PEP status changes", and screening "on every relevant transaction" through the API.
PricingPricing page: "Select the tier that fits your needs"; no prices shown.Starter: "EUR 0.10" per API call, "No monthly fee", "100 API calls free". Professional: "300 EUR/mo, 10,000 calls included, 0.03 EUR per additional call".
Data"Screen across 1,700+ global watchlists, including sanctions, PEPs, export controls, forced labor, law enforcement lists"; "200,000+ sources"; "We update our global watchlists and sanctions database every 5 minutes"."2.3M+ records · 10,000+ sources · 190+ jurisdictions"; API page states "10,000+ sources, hourly updated" and "All sources are updated multiple times per day."
Matching"Patented Jgram search algorithm" for "spelling variations, aliases, transliterations"; matches names "across 100+ languages"; "Adjust filters, thresholds, screening logic and list coverage"; AI agents "auto-adjudicate routine alerts" with "audit-ready documentation"."Decide which lists to include, use fuzzy or exact search, and dial in your false-positive threshold"; secondary identifiers such as date of birth refine fuzzy matching.
IntegrationAPI documentation, API knowledge base and an API trial booked through an integration call; web log-in at search.castellum.ai.REST API with JSON responses, Postman collection, SDKs and sandbox; Excel batch screening; free web search "without registration"; on-premise database download; "Every product offers a free trial."
Security and clientsHomepage states "SOC 2 compliant" (type not stated in text). Lead Bank named through a case study and a testimonial from its BSA Officer.No ISO 27001 or SOC 2 published; site shows "GDPR" and "DORA" badges. "Trusted by 500+ companies worldwide"; logos include DFX Swiss and Availabill. Company: dilisense GmbH, Switzerland.
Date read26 October 202626 October 2026

Not published or not stated by Castellum.AI: security and clients.

Not published or not stated by dilisense: security and clients and matching and alert handling.

Facts read on 26 October 2026 from: castellum.ai, castellum.ai/products/…, castellum.ai/pricing, castellum.ai/api-integration; and dilisense.com/en, dilisense.com/en/products/aml-screening-api.

Awards 2026.

Awards follow from the published scores and cannot be bought.

Castellum.AI
Leader 2026Top rated for screening coverage 2026Top rated for data depth and freshness 2026Top rated for matching and alert handling 2026
dilisense
Leader 2026Top rated for screening coverage 2026Top rated for published pricing 2026Top rated for data depth and freshness 2026Top rated for integration 2026

Who each suits.

From each provider's strongest criteria and published terms.

Castellum.AI suits

US banks and fintechs wanting very fresh data and automated alert review.

  • Screening coverage (5/5). Sanctions, PEP, adverse media, ongoing monitoring and transaction screening all published.
  • Data depth and freshness (5/5). 1,700+ watchlists published, updated every five minutes.
  • Matching and alert handling (5/5). Fuzzy and transliteration matching, 100+ languages, adjustable thresholds and automated alert review published.

Castellum.AI full profile

dilisense suits

Smaller payment and crypto firms wanting low published per-check prices.

  • Screening coverage (5/5). Sanctions, PEP, adverse media, ongoing monitoring and transaction-time screening published.
  • Published pricing (5/5). Per-call prices, a monthly plan with included volume and overage price published.
  • Data depth and freshness (5/5). 10,000+ sources and 190+ jurisdictions published, updated hourly.
  • Integration (5/5). API, Excel batch, free web search and free trial published.

dilisense full profile

Speak to an expert.

Tell us what you need and where you operate.