Payment InstitutionObtained Nexpay’s FCA Authorised Payment Institution licence.
WhatsApp and Telegram +44 7563 115980
[email protected]

We run the regulatory programmes that decide whether a firm is authorised, approved or cleared by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA): authorisation, change in control, remediation after FCA findings and regulatory change.
Selected engagements from more than 250 licences obtained since 2013, for payment, e-money and cryptoasset firms.
Volkswagen





Payment InstitutionObtained Nexpay’s FCA Authorised Payment Institution licence.
Electronic Money InstitutionObtained Dzing Finance’s FCA Authorised Electronic Money Institution licence.
Obtained Orbital’s FCA Authorised Payment Institution licence.
The short answer
Regulatory project management is the planning, governance and delivery of work a regulator will judge: an FCA authorisation, a change in control, remediation after FCA findings or a section 166 review, or new rules such as CASS 15 and the Consumer Duty. A project manager sets the plan, runs the steering committee and a RAID (risks, assumptions, issues and dependencies) log, and reports to the board.
A regulatory project differs from an ordinary business project in one respect: the outcome is judged by the regulator, not by the firm. A plan that delivers on time but cannot show the FCA how each requirement was met has failed. Regulatory project management therefore combines two skills: knowing what the rules and the regulator require, and running a programme with clear owners, milestones, decisions and evidence.
We run four kinds of programme:
An authorisation application is a programme of work, not a document. The FCA expects to see a firm that is ready to operate: a business plan and financial projections consistent with each other, capital in place, governance and people in post, policies that match the actual operating model, and outsourcing, safeguarding and financial crime arrangements that exist rather than being promised. Most delays come from inconsistency between these workstreams and from slow, incomplete answers to the FCA's questions.
We run the application as a single programme. We set the plan and the critical path, assign owners for each workstream, from the business plan and wind-down plan to the anti-money laundering framework and safeguarding arrangements, and check every document against the others before submission. After submission we manage the FCA's information requests, with a log of each question, owner, draft answer, review and response date, so the firm answers fully and consistently. Where the FCA asks for changes, we track them through to every affected document. We also plan the steps after authorisation, such as opening safeguarding accounts and the first regulatory returns, so the firm can operate from day one.
Under section 178 of FSMA, anyone who decides to acquire or increase control of an FCA authorised firm, including an authorised PI or EMI, must notify the FCA and obtain approval before completing. The FCA has up to 60 working days from a complete notification to assess it, and section 191F makes completing without approval a criminal offence. The transaction timetable therefore depends on regulatory work being started early and run carefully.
We run change in control as a project alongside the legal and commercial deal. That includes regulatory due diligence on the target, identifying every controller in the ownership chain, collecting the controller forms, source of funds evidence and, for acquisitions of more than 50 per cent, the business plan the FCA requires for a complete notification. We align the regulatory timetable with the deal timetable, so the sale and purchase agreement reflects a realistic approval date. We also plan the changes that follow completion, such as new directors, revised governance and updated policies, so they are approved and in place without breaching the firm's conditions of authorisation.
Remediation starts when the FCA identifies a problem: through supervisory findings, a request that the firm agree a voluntary requirement (VREQ), for example to stop taking new business until an issue is resolved, an own initiative requirement (OIREQ) imposed by the FCA, or a skilled person review under section 166 of FSMA. The FCA also uses attestations, in which a senior manager personally commits that a specific action will be, or has been, taken. Each of these turns a compliance issue into a programme with deadlines the FCA will hold the firm to.
A credible remediation programme has a clear scope linked to each finding, a root cause analysis rather than a list of symptoms, realistic milestones, named accountable owners and evidence that each fix works in practice. We build the plan, agree it with the board, run delivery and prepare the closure evidence for each action. Where a skilled person will verify the work, we make sure each action can be tested against the original finding, so the firm closes the issue at the first review rather than having it reopened.
New rules usually arrive with a fixed date and touch several functions at once: finance, operations, technology, compliance and the board. We run regulatory change as a programme from the published rules to the evidence that the firm complies, covering current and coming changes such as:
Regulators judge a programme by its governance as much as by its output. If the board cannot show that it understood the risks, made the key decisions and tracked delivery, the FCA will doubt the result even when the work is done. We set up governance in proportion to the size of the programme:
Every engagement follows the same four stages, scaled to the size of your firm and the deadline you face.
Assessment: we review the requirement, whether an FCA application, a transaction, a set of findings or new rules, and your current position against it. Written findings: you receive a scoped plan setting out workstreams, owners, milestones, risks and the evidence the FCA will expect, ranked by priority. Remediation: we run delivery, drafting documents, coordinating your staff, lawyers and other advisers, managing FCA correspondence and preparing closure evidence for each action. Ongoing support or outsourced roles: we provide a programme manager for the life of the programme, report to your steering committee and board, and can continue after delivery as your outsourced compliance officer or through a compliance monitoring programme that tests the changes still work. All plans, logs and evidence stay with your firm.
Buckingham Capital Consulting (BCC) was established in 2013 and has obtained more than 250 licences in over 60 countries for payment, e-money and crypto firms. That licensing work means we know, from the application stage onwards, the controls, people and documents that regulators, bank partners and auditors expect to find when they test a regulated firm.
We do not stop at the licence. BCC also arranges banking and runs compliance for regulated firms, so our advice reflects how a regulated business actually operates day to day: how its bank partners review it, how its regulator supervises it and how its own board needs to evidence control. Our aim is set out in one line: we open global markets to payment, e-money and crypto businesses, with the licences to enter, the banking to operate and the compliance to scale. If you are weighing your options, use the contact form to describe your firm and what you need, and we will reply with a proposed scope.
A regulatory project manager plans and runs work that a regulator will judge, such as an FCA authorisation, a change in control, remediation or new rules. They set the plan and critical path, assign owners, run the steering committee and RAID log, report to the board, manage regulator correspondence and keep the evidence that shows each requirement has been met.
A RAID log is a single record of a project's risks, assumptions, issues and dependencies. Each entry has an owner, a rating and a due date, and the steering committee reviews it at each meeting. In a regulatory programme it shows the board, and if needed the FCA, that delivery risks were identified and managed.
We turn each finding into a remediation action with a root cause, an accountable owner, milestones and the evidence needed to show it works. We agree the plan with the board, run delivery and prepare closure evidence. Where a skilled person will verify the work, each action is designed to be tested against the original finding.
A voluntary requirement (VREQ) is a restriction a firm agrees to at the FCA's invitation, for example not taking on new business until an issue is resolved. If a firm does not agree, the FCA may impose an own initiative requirement (OIREQ). Either way, lifting it depends on showing the FCA that the problem has been fixed.
Yes. We run the application as one programme covering the business plan, financial projections, governance, policies, safeguarding, financial crime controls and outsourcing, and check each document against the others. After submission we manage FCA questions through a log of owners, draft answers and deadlines, and we plan the steps needed to operate once authorised.
Payment and e-money firms should be embedding CASS 15, in force since 7 May 2026, maintaining Consumer Duty outcomes monitoring and annual board reporting, and keeping operational resilience mapping and testing current. Coming changes include FCA incident and third party reporting under PS26/2 from 18 March 2027 and consolidated complaints reporting from 2027.
Tell us what you need and where you operate.